Hi Faisal, I see you are running a 256 threaded vips on the 16 core system. Maybe try a 16 threaded version? Also, can you try running without garnet -- I'm curious to see how long the benchmarks take in that case.
Cheers, Tushar On Jun 21, 2017, at 3:07 AM, F. A. Faisal <dipu.7...@gmail.com<mailto:dipu.7...@gmail.com>> wrote: Dear All, I tried to simulate the Parsec 2.1 benchmarks with garnet 2.0. I found that other than Blackscholes, rest of benchmarks are taking several days (and still executing) and even I tried with increasing the <nthread> num of benchmarks, which actually don't have too much effect. However, the actual executions time should be in few hours. Please help me to increase the execution rate and how to know, how many percentage of benchmark program is being finished. My simlutation conditions- # scons FULL_SYSTEM=1 build/ALPHA/gem5.fast RUBY=true PROTOCOL=MESI_Two_Level # ./build/ALPHA/gem5.fast configs/example/fs.py --cpu-type=timing --script=script/vips_256c_simsmall.rcS --num-cpus=16 --mem-size=1GB --ruby --mesh-rows=4 --network=garnet2.0 --topology=Mesh_XY --caches --l2cache --l2_size=1MB --num-dirs=16 --num-l2=16 --l1d_size=32kB --l1i_size=32kB --l1d_assoc=2 --l1i_assoc=2 --disk-image=/home1/faisal/gem5/system/alpha/m5_system_2.0b3/disks/linux-parsec-2-1-m5.img Thanks in advance... Best regards, F. A. Faisal _______________________________________________ gem5-users mailing list gem5-users@gem5.org<mailto:gem5-users@gem5.org> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
_______________________________________________ gem5-users mailing list gem5-users@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
