Thanks !


On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Fernando Endo <fernando.en...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello again,
>
> I posted the patch here: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3547/
>
> Hope it helps,
>
> --
> Fernando A. Endo, Post-doc
>
> INRIA Rennes-Bretagne Atlantique
> France
>
>
> 2016-07-10 18:21 GMT+02:00 Jason Lowe-Power <ja...@lowepower.com>:
>
>> Or even better, post the patch on reviewboard (http://reviews.gem5.org)
>> so we can incorporate your work!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Jason
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 9, 2016, 8:08 PM Ayaz Akram <aaq...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Fernando,
>>>
>>> Will it be possible for you to post the relevant code here ?  That will
>>> just save some of my time.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Fernando Endo <fernando.en...@gmail.com
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I completely agree that FP and SIMD should have different opClasses. I
>>>> actually separated them, but didn't posted the patch yet (it is not that
>>>> difficult).
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Fernando A. Endo, Post-doc
>>>>
>>>> INRIA Rennes-Bretagne Atlantique
>>>> France
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2016-06-29 16:59 GMT+02:00 Ayaz Akram <aaq...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> I have a question regarding operation labeling of Arm64 instructions.
>>>>> I can see in reference manual [1] that most of the instructions in
>>>>> "floating-point and Advanced SIMD category" have both scalar and vector
>>>>> versions. My understanding is that source files
>>>>> src/arcch/arm/isa/insts/fp64.isa and src/arcch/arm/isa/insts/neon64.isa
>>>>> should correspond to scalar and vector versions of those instructions
>>>>> respectively. But, instructions in fp64.isa are also labelled as Simd
>>>>> operations. For example "fdiv" instruction in both files is labelled as
>>>>> "SimdFloatDivOp". Am I right in my understanding ? If yes, why do not we
>>>>> have scalar fp operations ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for your time !
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]
>>>>> https://people.mozilla.org/~sstangl/arm/AArch64-Reference-Manual.pdf
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> gem5-users mailing list
>>>>> gem5-users@gem5.org
>>>>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> gem5-users mailing list
>>>> gem5-users@gem5.org
>>>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> gem5-users mailing list
>>> gem5-users@gem5.org
>>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gem5-users mailing list
>> gem5-users@gem5.org
>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gem5-users mailing list
> gem5-users@gem5.org
> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
gem5-users@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users

Reply via email to