Thanks Jason. I'll try to fix it and possibly submit a patch.
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Jason Lowe-Power <ja...@lowepower.com> wrote: > To directly answer your question: The labeling of instruction in gem5 is > not accurate at all. Feel free to fix the labeling and submit a patch to > reviews.gem5.org, though! We'd welcome the fixes. > > BTW, you're correct that SIMD instructions are labeled as floating point > instructions. I've noticed that too. > > Cheers, > Jason > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 3:42 PM Ayaz Akram <aaq...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I am running a small C program on gem5. Disassembled binary of the >> program shows a lot of SSE instructions, but simulator's output stats.txt >> does not show any SIMD operation type committed. On generating the >> execution trace from gem5, I can see that those SSE instructions are >> decoded into operations and labelled as FloatAdd or other similar >> instructions. My question is, how accurate is the labelling of operations >> in gem5 for x86 ? I mean it seems a bit misleading to see that no SIMD >> instructions are committed , while the benchmark has some of them. >> >> Thanks >> _______________________________________________ >> gem5-users mailing list >> gem5-users@gem5.org >> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users > > > _______________________________________________ > gem5-users mailing list > gem5-users@gem5.org > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users >
_______________________________________________ gem5-users mailing list gem5-users@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
