On May 10, 2013, at 11:26 AM, Amin Farmahini <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Erik Tomusk <[email protected]> wrote: > > *It shouldn't be too difficult to re-introduce the access limit set by > cachePorts. However, this change would be undone and superseded by patch > #1422 on the reviewboard if it ever gets committed. Is re-introducing the > cachePorts limit worthwhile? > The cachePorts thing is very simplistic. The patch, on the other hand, does > not conform with gem5 rules. I do not think this patch gets ever committed > because I don't have time to fix it. You may want to take a look at and get > some ideas. > I would like to see something like Amin's patch committed, however I too haven't had enough time to clean up his patch a little bit and I'm not completely sure if it's the best way to go about things, but I'm happy for an OK way that fixes a problem. Thanks, Ali
_______________________________________________ gem5-users mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
