I am not an ARM guy, but by looking at the spec I would say that ARM_O3_V7a.py (arm_detailed) is modeled after A9.
Thanks, Amin On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Fernando Endo <fernando.en...@gmail.com>wrote: > Hi, > > I also wonder what cpu "arm_detailed" correspond to. If it simulates a > real cpu, it can only be A9 or A15, the two only OOO processors within > ARMv7-A arch. > > Regards, > > -- > Fernando A. Endo, PhD student and researcher > > CEA Lab > and > Université de Grenoble, UJF > France > > 2012/10/29 Robert PINSKER <robert.pins...@st.com> > >> Hi**** >> >> ** ** >> >> I note the response Jack Harvard gave in February stating that use of >> ARM_O3_V7a.py should give A15-like simulation.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Am I right in believing that “—cpu-type=arm_detailed” will select this >> V7a config?**** >> >> ** ** >> >> If so, I am somewhat puzzled because my measurements of Coremark using >> arm_detailed are within 2% of the result I expect for A9.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> If I use “—cpu-type=detailed”, I get Coremark figures considerably higher >> than I get even with A15, i.e. apparently not representative of any ARM >> core.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Can anyone explain this, or tell me where I am going wrong?**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Thanks**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Robert.** >> >> ** ** >> >> _______________________________________________ >> gem5-users mailing list >> gem5-users@gem5.org >> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users >> > > _______________________________________________ > gem5-users mailing list > gem5-users@gem5.org > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users >
_______________________________________________ gem5-users mailing list gem5-users@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
