Thanks for your answer. Ruby is a module in GEM5 which simulate memory hierarchy. Suppose there is an application that its execution time is 20 ms on a real system. GEM5 simulate the application in about 15 min. Hos is MARSS86 simulation speed?
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Payne, Benjamin <bpa...@lps.umd.edu> wrote: > Hello,**** > > ** ** > > I’m not familiar with what you are referring to by the ruby module – is > that an addon for Gem5?**** > > ** ** > > You have a good question, but how would I quantify the difference in > simulation speeds between MARSS and Gem5? Is there an established benchmark > to run?**** > > ** ** > > Kindly,**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > Ben Payne**** > > ** ** > > *From:* gem5-users-boun...@gem5.org [mailto:gem5-users-boun...@gem5.org] *On > Behalf Of *Hamid Reza Khaleghzadeh > *Sent:* Tuesday, October 23, 2012 9:31 AM > *To:* gem5 users mailing list > *Subject:* Re: [gem5-users] gem5 versus MARSS**** > > ** ** > > I have a question about MARSS. As you know GEM5 simulation speed with ruby > module is very slow. May I know MARSS simulation speed? > > Thanks **** > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 2:26 AM, Andreas Hansson <andreas.hans...@arm.com> > wrote:**** > > Hi Benjamin, > > The list is long…gem5 has (amongst other things): > > a variety of CPU models that are orthogonal to the ISA, atomic for speed, > in order and O3 for details uarch models > > BSD license (thus both academia and companies involved and contributing) > > full-system ready-to-run Android disk images and configurations, not just > your average chip-multi-processor, but also heterogeneous > application-processor-like systems with state-of-the-art CPU models > > a very active (and large) user community > > > Ultimately using one or the other really depends on what problem it is you > want to address. > > Andreas > > From: <Payne>, Benjamin <bpa...@lps.umd.edu<mailto:bpa...@lps.umd.edu>> > Reply-To: gem5 users mailing list <gem5-users@gem5.org<mailto: > gem5-users@gem5.org>> > Date: Monday, 22 October 2012 22:06 > To: "gem5-users@gem5.org<mailto:gem5-users@gem5.org>" <gem5-users@gem5.org > <mailto:gem5-users@gem5.org>> > Subject: [gem5-users] gem5 versus MARSS**** > > > Hello, > > What is the difference between gem5 > http://gem5.org/Main_Page > and MARSS (Micro-ARchitectural and System Simulator for x86-based Systems) > http://marss86.org/~marss86/index.php/Home > > As far as I can tell, > -gem5 can support Alpha, ARM, SPARC, and x86 instruction set > architectures, whereas MARSS is only for x86. > -gem5 can be integrated into Structural Simulation Toolkit, whereas MARSS > has not been > -both gem5 and MARSS can simulate multiple cores > -both gem5 and MARSS can use DRAMSim2 > > Please correct me if any of these statements are incorrect. > > Are there any other considerations? > > Thank you, > > > Ben Payne > http://mst.edu/~bhpxc9/ > Suite 450, Room S452 > 5520 Research Park Drive > Catonsville, MD 21228-4870 > Laboratory for Physical Sciences > http://www.lps.umd.edu/ > office: 443-654-7890 > cell: 608-308-2413 > > **** > > -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are > confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended > recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the > contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the > information in any medium. Thank you. > > _______________________________________________ > gem5-users mailing list > gem5-users@gem5.org > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users**** > > > > > -- > Hamid Reza Khaleghzadeh > http://hkhaleghzadeh.webs.com > > > **** > > _______________________________________________ > gem5-users mailing list > gem5-users@gem5.org > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users > -- Hamid Reza Khaleghzadeh http://hkhaleghzadeh.webs.com
_______________________________________________ gem5-users mailing list gem5-users@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
