HI Dibakar,
I'd have to think carefully about it, but you may be right about TSO. I'd hope that someone who is more familiar with x86 could respond. Thanks, Ali On 22.06.2012 07:46, Dibakar Gope wrote: > Hi Ali, > > Thanks for the response. Ok, I got the point. I thought that since the O3 attempts to support the TSO for X86 , so inherently this enforces/covers the regular load-load ordering present in any stronger consistency model. But if it inline with ARM's requirements,then does it not violate x86 and TSO's conventional load-load ordering? > > thanks, > Dibakar
_______________________________________________ gem5-users mailing list gem5-users@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
