Yes, I have tested it and I have gotten some error. I found that FS mode is better than SE one for pthread application.
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Mahmood Naderan <mahmood...@gmail.com>wrote: > I doubt if you can successfully use SE mode with a pthread > application. You may get some "unimplemented syscalls" errors. > > > > On 1/4/12, Hamid Reza Khaleghzadeh <khaleghza...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi > > > > I am working on CMP Scheduling Algorithms. In my case, Gem5 is used as a > > cmp simulator. I bind threads of multi thread applications to cores of > the > > simulated machine manually, and compare obtained results as execution > time > > and cache misses. By the way, In my research, coherency protocols are > > important. So simulated machine must consider these protocols (MOESI and > > MESI). I found that FS mode satisfies my needs, but it take a long time > to > > simulate (especially when ruby is activated). Therefore, I decide to use > > the SE mode, but don't know this satisfies my needs or not. Could you > help > > me? > > > > Sorry to bother you. > > > > > -- > -- > // Naderan *Mahmood; > _______________________________________________ > gem5-users mailing list > gem5-users@gem5.org > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users > -- Hamid Reza Khaleghzadeh
_______________________________________________ gem5-users mailing list gem5-users@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
