So it looks like the right-thing-to-do now is to add introspection to Babl (otherwise we will need dirty workarounds in gegl).
js -><- On 12 February 2015 at 21:01, <jcup...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12 February 2015 at 16:30, Joao S. O. Bueno <gwid...@mpc.com.br> wrote: >> Otherwise, I think I will rewire the python bindings using another >> method to bridge to the C library, which is more predictive and better >> supported. > > I've made a Python binding for my largish C library using > gobject-introspection and not had any serious problems. It was a bit > wonky a year or so ago, but it honestly seems OK now. Performance is > good too, and I don't see any memory leaks. I'm very grateful for it. > > I've been trying to make a Ruby binding in the same way and oh dear oh > dear it's a lot harder :( > > John _______________________________________________ gegl-developer-list mailing list List address: gegl-developer-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer-list
