For posterity: <Daniel_S> mitch_: that and paramspecs has your name on it from a GPL source, so if you reply to the email (so I an ref it in the commit) core will be fine :) <Daniel_S> so I can* <mitch_> Daniel_S: i am fine with whatever relicensing of my code between any components of gimp, gegl and babl <mitch_> and if somebody isn't we shall purge their code and nail them to the cross of bikeshedding <Daniel_S> mitch_: I know, I just like legal things in public email not IRC logs :P <mitch_> then you are doomed <Daniel_S> lol <mitch_> i tell you here <mitch_> :)
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 6:52 AM, Øyvind Kolås <pip...@gimp.org> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Daniel Sabo <daniels...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Mike Henning noticed that this file is actually licensed GPL. It looks >> like the only contributors are mitch and pippin, but I don't know what they >> might have used code from. Is the copyright on this clean? Can we change >> the license to LGPL? >> > > gegl-cache.c is copyright clean, the GPL lingers by accident from a time > when it was part of the experimental GTK UI that the GEGL binary used to > ship with. > > /Ø > -- > > «The future is already here. It's just not very evenly distributed» > -- William Gibson > http://pippin.gimp.org/ http://ffii.org/ >
_______________________________________________ gegl-developer-list mailing list gegl-developer-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer-list
