On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:10 PM, <boo...@nc.rr.com> wrote: > OK. It is not clear to me that the new API using GeglBuffers will let Python > plugins use GEGL, > only C-language plugins, unless there are more changes to, for example, the > GIMP PDB or to Pygimp. > But I understand it is not high priority, since few GIMP plugin developers, > using Python and Scheme, need direct access to GEGL? > I suppose the guiding principle is that fundamental filter operations should > be GEGL plugins written in C. > But why should non-fundamental Python GIMP plugins need to go through the PDB > to get to GEGL? > I suppose the architecture of GIMP plugins is of no concern to GEGL, and I am > not an expert.
It is correct that the architecture of GIMP plugins is of no concern to GEGL, but the API for GIMP plug-ins will as stated also change. PixelRegions will go away as should plug-ins knowledge of tiles. The only way of interacting with pixels both in GIMPs core and in plug-ins will eventually be through manipulating GeglBuffers. /Ø -- «The future is already here. It's just not very evenly distributed» -- William Gibson _______________________________________________ gegl-developer-list mailing list gegl-developer-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer-list
