Friends - On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 01:41:08PM -0700, Jared Casper wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Andrew Poelstra <as...@sfu.ca> wrote: > > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:56:40AM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: > >> I'm a Perl fan myself. > > I think Python would be a better choice. > Scala anyone?
It's probably a long shot, but I would give my vote for any language backed up by an independent standards committee. The standards document is a contract between the language implementor and the coding in that language. It takes a big step away from the "it works for me" mind-set and towards a long-term supportable investment in reliable code. Scheme fits: IEEE 1178-1990, reaffirmed in 2008. Not that I'm any fan of IEEE's copyright behavior. ECMAScript? <gd&r> - Larry _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
