+1 python. If only it were as easy as voting... On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Geoff Swan <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 python :) > > On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 4:52 AM, Andrew Poelstra <[1][email protected]> > wrote: > > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:56:40AM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: > > > > Opportunity to pick a more modern language, too. Something more > > os-agnostic, we've had issues with scheme on Windows before. > > > > I'm a Perl fan myself. > > > > Although Perl is probably better for string-handling, I think > Python would be a better choice. It "feels" a lot more like a > Lisp and quite a bit more well-known these days. > It is also platform-agnostic, handles errors more cleanly, > and is usually easier to read. > Having said that, I have only a passing knowledge of both Perl > and Python. > -- > Andrew Poelstra > Email: asp11 at [2]sfu.ca OR apoelstra at [3]wpsoftware.net > Web: [4]http://www.wpsoftware.net/andrew/ > > _______________________________________________ > geda-user mailing list > [5][email protected] > [6]http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user > > References > > 1. mailto:[email protected] > 2. http://sfu.ca/ > 3. http://wpsoftware.net/ > 4. http://www.wpsoftware.net/andrew/ > 5. mailto:[email protected] > 6. http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user > > > > _______________________________________________ > geda-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user > >
-- Mark Rages, Engineer Midwest Telecine LLC [email protected] _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
