John Griessen wrote: > I think the name package could create confusion > with layout package used to implement a circuit,
I proposed "package" because eagle uses this term for a very similar concept. Yes, package already has a distinct meaning in the context of electronics. I would not be happy with a variation of "library". A lib is a collection of objects of the same kind -- traditionally books. What my proposal aims for, is by contrast a wrap of different classes of objects. The term "container" comes to mind. This clearly can contain about anything. Maybe, it is a bit too versatile. Worse, it usually means the containing structure, not its content. Next try: "packet" This can also contain all kinds of objects. It closely avoids the clash with the meaning of "package" in data sheets. ---<)kaimartin(>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak Email: k...@familieknaak.de Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel: http://pool.sks-keyservers.net:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x6C0B9F53 _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
