Ales Hvezda wrote: >> The symbols in the current default lib fail for both. > > Why don't you use gedasymbols.org to show us how you would fix the > current gEDA/gaf shipped symbol library.
In a way, I already do ;-) See my section at gedasymbols.org. Of course, the actual choice of components was guided by the kind of projects I do. And I did not strive for completeness beyond what I actually need. > Create your ideal library, IMHO, we all agree, that there is no such thing in a general sense. No size fits all. That does not preclude improvement over the current situation. > no limits, or restrictions. Also, feel free to use as much disk space > on gedasymbols.org (I have explicit permission from DJ) as you need. Size wouldn't be an issue, anyway. In fact, I believe, the default libs should be cut down to essentials -- Few instances, but excellent quality, ready to use. Given the availability of gedasymbols.org, there is no point to have several GND symbols and three kinds of BC247. Such a lib can act as a starting point for first projects and for a localized set of libs. > Let people know it exists, use it, and comment on it. Then, we can > compare your symbol library to the broken shipped symbol library and > see if it makes sense to switch. I consider to bite... ---<)kaimartin(>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak Email: k...@familieknaak.de Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel: http://pool.sks-keyservers.net:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x6C0B9F53 _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
