On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 07:21:00PM +0200, Stephan Boettcher wrote:
> As soon as we have the option to define arbitary layer types, we also
> need to be able to define arbitrary DRC rules. The star-point may be a
> footprint with a structure on some non-conductive "shorts" layer, which
> will need to be accompanied by a set of design rules in the technology
> specs. The fact that the non-conductive "shorts" layer is implemented
> in conductive copper by merging the layer with the bottom copper is
> irrelevant, since for netlist purposes it is non-conductive, just like a
> "resistor" layer. Part of the design-rule check is to be perfomed
> manually, you'll always need to check your footprints in your library.
I will keep this issue in mind when reworking the layer stack.
I have not started yet, but will shortly. I needed to sort out some
local problems, sorry.
Marti Kupec
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
