I had a couple of issues with the patch process - I didn't bother checking which version I should have had (i'm using 1.7.0 20110116) but went and manually patched it myself.
BTW - the first hunk worked fine - it was only the second one that failed. Otherwise it seems great, cheers :) On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak <[1][email protected]> wrote: Peter Clifton wrote: > Could someone give this a test and come up with any counter-reasons why > this attached patch is NOT a good idea? I vaguely recall a similar (or > identical?) idea was discussed on the list recently? I like it. It is another step to gschem/pcb GUI similarity. ---<)kaimartin(>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak Email: [2][email protected] Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel: [3]http://pool.sks-keyservers.net:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x6C0B9F53 _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [4][email protected] [5]http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user References 1. mailto:[email protected] 2. mailto:[email protected] 3. http://pool.sks-keyservers.net:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x6C0B9F53 4. mailto:[email protected] 5. http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
_______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
