On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 09:23:44AM -0700, Russell Dill wrote: > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Peter Clifton <pc...@cam.ac.uk> wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 08:38 -0700, John Doty wrote: > >> On Feb 24, 2011, at 8:22 AM, Peter Clifton wrote: > >> > Means C didn't find the function, and it assumes it returns integer in > >> > that case. Dumb convention IMO. > > [chop] I believe the behaviour in question dates back to the > > days where prototypes were very different, and C sometimes had to > > assume. > > ...if only there was some sort of flag or option that could be passed > to the compiler to convince it otherwise...
</me puts on straight-man hat> You mean -Werror=implicit-function-declaration? (or just -Wall, and scrutinize warnings) - Larry _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
