Many commenters on the license, including bunnie, seem to be making a logic mistake:
"You can't say things *should* be this way, because things *are not* this way." http://www.iep.utm.edu/fallacy/#Is-Ought So if hardware is not entirely free right now, with binary blobs even in the most open drivers, does this mean that a license cannot require fully open firmware? No. It may limit adoption of the license, but that says nothing about if the license is correct to require that. If the license is a goal, rather just a codification of existing practice, that is fine by me. Regards, Mark markra...@gmail -- Mark Rages, Engineer Midwest Telecine LLC [email protected] _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
