On Mar 11, 2009, at 10:29 AM, Stuart Brorson wrote: >> Well, I just used gschem to make symbols for the 64-pin XC9572 (by >> modifying the symbols for the 44-pin XC9532 from gedasymbols.org). It >> wasn't that much work. > > Pretty easy is right. > >> However now I'll have to set all those pinseq values. > > Quit yer whining. > > Pinseq is not used unless you have a slotted symbol > (use number 1), or you want to use spice-sdb (use number 2).
Or the old spice backend or the vipec back end. And maybe somebody in the future will want a back end for some other netlist format that identifies pins positionally. Unfortunately, pinseq is overloaded (multiple potentially incompatible uses) and confusing. > Otherwise, you don't need to set pinseq at all. You only need to set > pinnumber to be able to netlist to PCB. > > Hmmmm.... maybe I need to change this piece of gEDA documentation: > > http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:master_attributes_list#pinseq > > I'm pretty sure this page is wrong. Maybe people will complain less > if it's fixed. > > Stuart > > > _______________________________________________ > geda-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user > John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ [email protected] _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
