Am Sonntag, den 21.09.2008, 12:54 +0200 schrieb David Kuehling: > > Are the CAPC*, and RES* footprints way too small? > > CAPC0603 is *not* a 0603. The CAPC* and RES* footprints use metric > units, the CAPC0603 corresponds to a 0201 mil footprint. For the 0603 > mil footprint use CAPC1608*. > > See also the comments in /usr/share/pcb/m4/geda.inc
This is really a serious trap. _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
