> I am not opposed to changing it to only apply the minimum annulus test > on holes. I think the historic reason is pcb used to only have the min > width parameter. But now that we've had the min annulus parameter for a > while we should probably flip the switch. Any objections?
No objections from me. At some point we should expand the DRC parameters, too, but I'd rather change to a more flexible file format first so we don't have to keep adding positional parameters :-P _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
