Hey Jukka,
Yes, the behavior has existed for quite some time on the utilities. If
you know the extent it's easy to calculate the -tr, (max - min) / pixels.
Being that the functionality exists elsewhere and given the fact that
I'm LAZY, it would be nice to have everywhere. :)
Thanks!
Scott
On 11/16/25 11:04, Rahkonen Jukka wrote:
Hi,
I believe it would not be extremely hard to compute the other size parameter so
that the result would have square pixels. As a workaround, if you can guess an
about suitable pixel size you can define the resolution with equal x and y size:
gdal vector rasterize --resolution [pixelsize,pixelsize]
The behavior is not new. The traditional gdal_rasterize
https://gdal.org/en/stable/programs/gdal_rasterize.html requires also both
width and height.
-Jukka Rahkonen-
________________________________________
Lähettäjä: gdal-dev <[email protected]> käyttäjän Scott via gdal-dev
<[email protected]> puolesta
Lähetetty: Lauantai 15. marraskuuta 2025 21.45
Vastaanottaja: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Aihe: [gdal-dev] gdal rasterize vs resize
Greetings,
When using gdal raster resize I can use --size 0,800 and it will compute
the width.
However, when using gdal vector rasterize --size 0,800 it throws the error:
ERROR 1: Wrong value for -ts parameter.
Having it compute the missing value is highly desirable!
GDAL v3.12.0
Thanks!
Scott
--
http://www.postholer.com/
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
