You know I like to complicate things 🙂 I'm mostly worried about not compatibility between our format and others. So, I'm doing that. At least is not so difficult to pack in subdatasets and make another iteration to translate them. People just remember about the -sds option if want to translate all subdatasets.
Thanks for your opinions. ________________________________ De: Even Rouault <even.roua...@spatialys.com> Enviat el: dimecres, 21 de maig de 2025 21:04 Per a: Abel Pau <a....@creaf.cat>; gdal-dev <gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org> Tema: Re: [gdal-dev] NODATA values in diferents bands in a DataSet Le 21/05/2025 à 20:53, Abel Pau a écrit : Okay, thanks! So the interpretation we are aiming for is option a): Each band is treated independently, and each one has its own NODATA value. The NODATA value of one band is unrelated to that of the others. That said, the question is whether this behavior is consistently supported across all formats, or if it only works this way in our custom implementation. GDAL core (and most algorithms) should work fine, but if you want to convert to GeoTIFF or COG, they only support the same nodata value for all bands (although we could potentially extend the GDAL_NODATA tag to support one value per band, but that would be debate for another thread), and the same band type for all bands. If not, perhaps the more robust approach would be to separate bands with different NODATA values into different subdatasets. That's a possibility indeed. I'm not sure any implemented format has done such effort, but there is nothing inherently wrong if you want to do that. -- http://www.spatialys.com My software is free, but my time generally not.
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
