Hi Andrew,
Can you be more specific about which RFCs ? Quick grep shows RFC9
superseded per RFC83 and RFC68 superseded per RFC98.
If that can help, we could potentially keep in master a mostly empty
document for superseded RFCs that would contain just a link to the new
RFC and a link to the supersed text pointing at
https://gdal.org/en/release-{last-one-with-the-full-text}/development/rfc/rfc-XXXX.html
Even
Le 14/05/2025 à 19:45, Andrew Bell via gdal-dev a écrit :
Hi,
I was wondering if some of the RFCs should be placed somewhere other
than on the web site because they are obsolete/superseded. I think
this would make it easier to find relevant current information. Some
of the RFCs are marked as superseded, but from the standpoint of a web
search, the more there is to read through, the less likely that I'll
find the correct information that I'm looking for.
Thoughts?
--
Andrew Bell
andrew.bell...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
--
http://www.spatialys.com
My software is free, but my time generally not.
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
