Thanks for the explanation. I'm +1 on pro subscriptions for GDAL and PROJ. The extra number of runners (6 in pro vs 2 in the current plan) will also be helpful for GDAL.
Dan On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 4:30 PM Howard Butler <how...@hobu.co> wrote: > > > > On Apr 17, 2025, at 2:10 PM, Daniel Baston <dbas...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Howard, > > > > I agree that RTD is useful for our project. Given the recent funding for > two documentation contributors, the pull request previews that RTD provides > will be especially helpful. > > > > Still, I'd argue the project most essential for our docs is Sphinx > itself. Do you know if/how dollars sent to RTD make their way to Sphinx > maintenance? Or should we consider supporting Sphinx maintenance in some > way? Maybe this isn't an either/or, I don't know what our ideal budget for > these things is. > > I agree Sphinx is a priority need for our projects just as Breathe is, but > it doesn't appear Sphinx has clear financial infrastructure beyond GitHub > Sponsors. I don't know if that is the appropriate place to put financial > resources to work for the project. If you want to work through finding > someone to be able to take resources and help to manage them using them to > move the project forward, we should explore that avenue as well. > > RTD has the ability to send us an invoice, and that ultimately means a lot > as far as being able to send money places and have it be effective. > > Howard
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
