+1 Howard
> On Feb 10, 2025, at 9:53 AM, Even Rouault via gdal-dev > <gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > I move to adopt RFC 107 > > Starting with my +1 > > Even > > Le 06/02/2025 à 22:19, Even Rouault via gdal-dev a écrit : >> Hi, >> >> Please review https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/11814: Add >> OGRLayer::IGetExtent() and OGRLayer::ISetSpatialFilter() >> >> It could have gone through a pull request business-as-usual, but as this >> impacts a number of drivers, including out-of-tree ones, this is worth this >> small RFC. >> >> Summary >> ------- >> >> This RFC changes the prototype of the OGRLayer::GetExtent(), GetExtent3D(), >> SetSpatialFilter() and SetSpatialFilterRect() methods. >> >> Motivation >> ---------- >> >> Originally GetExtent(), SetSpatialFilter() and SetSpatialFilterRect() were >> designed for a single geometry field. When support for multiple geometry >> fields >> was added per :ref:`rfc-41`, alternate virtual methods were added to accept a >> ``int iGeomField`` argument, but this causes slightly repeating code patterns >> in most drivers, and omissions of the boilerplate can cause bugs. >> >> Even >> > -- > http://www.spatialys.com > My software is free, but my time generally not. > > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev