+1 Dan

On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 2:37 PM Kurt Schwehr via gdal-dev <
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org> wrote:

> Thanks Even and Erik for the additional work on RFC 100!!
>
> Let's get the voting going again. I hereby change my vote:
>
> +1 KurtS
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 10:24 AM Kurt Schwehr <schw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I vote -1 currently as there hasn't been enough discussion. I just added
>> comments to the RFC PR.
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 6:40 AM Erik Schnetter via gdal-dev <
>> gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I move to adopt RFC 100 (adding support for the float16 data type).
>>>
>>> The pull request for RFC 100 is here:
>>> https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/10146 .
>>>
>>> A candidate implementation is here:
>>> https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/11180 .
>>>
>>> I vote +1.
>>>
>>> -erik
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> gdal-dev mailing list
>>> gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Reply via email to