+1 Javier On Wed, 15 Jan 2025, 16:38 Kurt Schwehr via gdal-dev, < gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
> +1 KurtS. > > Thank you!! > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 7:13 AM Even Rouault via gdal-dev < > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> The candidate implementation is now ready (I'm afraid nobody will find >> the energy to review the ~ 4000 different edits throughout the code base... >> ) and all CI targets are green. *All* use of the deprecated C versions has >> been removed from our C++ code (besides the place where they are defined, >> and autotest code), and the few uses of them in C code is OK. There's no >> risk of re-introducing them since their definition is now hidden from GDAL >> C++ code. >> >> So, >> >> Motion: RFC 105 text: Add and use safe path manipulation functions: >> https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/11640 >> >> Starting with my +1, >> >> Even >> >> -- http://www.spatialys.com >> My software is free, but my time generally not. >> Butcher of all kinds of standards, open or closed formats. At the end, this >> is just about bytes. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> gdal-dev mailing list >> gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org >> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev >> > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev >
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
