Hi Michael, and thank you. On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 at 19:06, Michael Sumner <mdsum...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You can't use a geotransform unless the data are actually regular. There's > no saying whether the lon lat arrays describe a regular grid redundantly > without inspecting them (it's also very common for formats to deliver lon > lat coords when the data is actually a regular grid in a different crs, but > it's not easy to automatically determine that situation which is the entire > entropy-increasing problem with the degenerate coordinate model of > netcdf-alikes. There's hope though, see xarray PR 9543 for a crack of light > in the gloom). > However, I did not understand one thing. Is my vrt wrong and should I not use “geotransform,” and is there a more correct way to write it? Or is this type of netcdf not well readable with gdal (at least until PR 9543 closes)? Best regards -- ___________________ Andrea Borruso website: https://medium.com/tantotanto 38° 7' 48" N, 13° 21' 9" E, EPSG:4326 ___________________ "cercare e saper riconoscere chi e cosa, in mezzo all’inferno, non è inferno, e farlo durare, e dargli spazio" Italo Calvino
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
