My biggest question is why you would mix vector and raster operations in the CLI.
And since we're taking on changing things, I would wonder why those two parts of the codebase are commingled. Is there a strong reason not to have an OGR project that does vector operations and a GDAL project that does raster operations? It seems like mostly an historical artifact. On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 12:58 PM Even Rouault via gdal-dev <gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > Please review https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/11216 : Adding a "gdal" > front-end command line interface > > Summary: > > This RFC introduces a single "gdal" front-end command line interface > (CLI), that exposes sub-commands, adopts a consistent naming of options, > introduces new capabilities (pipelines) and a concept of algorithms that > can be > run through the CLI or that can be automatically discovered and > invoked programmatically. > > Even > > -- > http://www.spatialys.com > My software is free, but my time generally not. > Butcher of all kinds of standards, open or closed formats. At the end, this > is just about bytes. > > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev -- Andrew Bell andrew.bell...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
