On Thu, 31 Oct 2024, Even Rouault wrote:



 should it? In
 https://github.com/holans/ST-COS/issues/2
 there is a chunk from a backtrace in gdb from CPL_area to
 OGRGeometryCollection::get_GeodesicLength, which CPL_area didn't call
 itself.

This is fishy. As you use the C++ API, I assume you've rebuilt the sf package against the GDAL 3.10.0 headers ... ? Because currently it smells like not, and some virtual method mixup. Or the stack-trace isn't reliable (which might happen sometimes because of optimizations)


This is Norway, we are fishy by definition. Yes, sf fully re-installed (configure uses gdal-config, headers for rc2 installed 13:37 CEST), sf installed 14:04 CEST.

Roger




--
Roger Bivand
Emeritus Professor
Department of Economics, Norwegian School of Economics,
Postboks 3490 Ytre Sandviken, 5045 Bergen, Norway.
e-mail: roger.biv...@nhh.no

_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Reply via email to