Hi,
Le 03/07/2024 à 07:25, Andrea Giudiceandrea via gdal-dev a écrit :
Hi all,
IIUC, the documentation states that with the -al option, ogrinfo
should output the info of all layers in a container (e.g. a GPKG
file). Anyway, when a layer name is provided in the command line
string alongside the -al option, than it looks like the -al option is
overridden and not taken in consideration.
Is this the expected behaviour?
Problably more in unspecified territory than really intended/designed.
-al and giving a layer name should probably be mutually exclusive. Not
clear if at that point of history it would be worth changing that to
error out and breaking existing user workflows...
The same behaviour occurs with the -json option, where the
documentation states than in such case the -al option is also implicit.
-json is a bit specific in the way that you mostly use to feed other
code and so you don't necessarily need to have as many different level
of details as for for the text / human friendly output.
If those are the correct and expected behaviour, maybe it would be
useful to clarify it in the documentation.
It would probably wouldn't hurt mentioning in the documentation that if
both -al and layer name(s) are specified, the later will override the
former (but that users shouldn't rely on that, in case we change our
mind at some later point)
Even
--
http://www.spatialys.com
My software is free, but my time generally not.
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
