which is misplaced, because people are who merely intending to compile
gdal but not contribute to it, still need to know. I almost didn't even
look at it before writing that it wasn't documented which C++ flavor is
needed, because it was obviously not about what I needed to know.
Attempt to improve in https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/10151
2) NEWS for 3.9 does not mention that there is now a requirement for a C++17
compiler.
==> 3rd bullet point of "In a nutshell"
* [RFC
98](https://gdal.org/development/rfc/rfc98_build_requirements_gdal_3_9.html):
Build requirements for GDAL 3.9
3) The person also marked gdal for c17
Can you be more explicit about you mean by "the person also marked gdal
for c17" : where exactly?
--
http://www.spatialys.com
My software is free, but my time generally not.
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
