Sean Gillies <sean.gill...@gmail.com> writes: > I'm in favor of overhauling the types in the next major version. However, > I'm not convinced we need to jump immediately to 4.0. The current situation > isn't ideal, but isn't holding us back very much right? GDAL is growing new > features rapidly and it doesn't seem that the old types have been a blocker > or huge friction for core developers.
As a packager: I don't care if the version number is 3.8 or 4.0. That really doesn't matter. ABI breaks are significant, but not a huge big deal. It requires marking all depending packages as needing new versions. (I am expecting that these types are in signatures in the public ABI.) _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
