Thank you for the clarification. Since those changes are useful by themselves then I change my vote to +1

Daniel


On 2016-12-14 10:19 AM, Even Rouault wrote:
On mercredi 14 décembre 2016 10:05:46 CET Daniel Morissette wrote:

+0 as I'm wondering if there could be a better way to handle this, i.e.

it's not clear to me how useful it is to read/write those new geometry

types without maintaining the (topological?) relationships between the

objects. I am no expert with that type of data structures so my concerns

may be completely invalid too and I have no alternative to offer, hence

my +0.



The Simple Feature model clearly doesn't maintain topological
relationships. Topological consistency must be checked in a later stage
with a IsValid() call for example (this also holds true for already
handled geometry types). And if you look at some drivers that implement
TIN currenlty like PostGIS or GML, they are based on the Simple Feature
model as well. Only shapefile/filegdb has something a bit stronger with
shared nodes.



I think that support for topological geometries would be a completely
different concept to be added in OGR. Would require management of nodes,
edges and faces, and conversions between simple feature geometries and
topogeometries. I had some preliminary discussions about that with an
interested party in the past but they didn't go further.



In the current state of things, the TIN support should be hopefully good
enough for conversions between PostGIS, GML, DXF and shapefile/filegdb.



Even





Daniel



On 2016-12-13 1:13 PM, Even Rouault wrote:

> On vendredi 9 décembre 2016 12:10:25 CET Even Rouault wrote:

>> Hi,

>>

>>

>>

>> There have been some good remarks, one regarding integration with GEOS

>

> that

>

>> I've taken into account in the implementation, another one
regarding the

>>

>> possibility to get indexed TIN that I think can be later added if
needed.

>>

>>

>>

>> So I move to adopt RFC 64: Triangle, Polyhedral surface and TIN

>>

>>

>>

>> https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc64_triangle_polyhedralsurface_tin

>>

>>

>>

>> Starting with my +1,

>

> Friendly remainder that this motion is under vote.

>

>

>

> Even

>

>

>

> --

>

> Spatialys - Geospatial professional services

>

> http://www.spatialys.com

>

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> gdal-dev mailing list

> [email protected]

> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev





--

Spatialys - Geospatial professional services

http://www.spatialys.com



_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev



--
Daniel Morissette
http://www.mapgears.com/
T: +1 418-696-5056 #201

http://evouala.com/ - Location Intelligence Made Easy
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Reply via email to