> > Sorry, should have linked to those in the initial email. In the spec > > (above), see > > 5.9.3.6 Freespace TRE (FREESA) > > 5.9.4.8 Frame-Synchronous Metadata Wrapper TRE (FSYNWA) > > 5.9.4.9 Frame-Asynchronous Metadata Wrapper TRE (FASYWA) > > > > I would caution that it's a bit confusing the first time. > > OK, that's clearer with the doc. When you say "I'm planning to open code the > FSYNWA / FASYWA case", do you mean hard-code ? Sounds OK. Could still be > retrofitted later into something more general purpose if such constructs are > found to be common. Yes to the question about hard-coding it.
I haven't look into the nitffile.c enough to have a patch, but the two wrapper TREs should be similar, except for the labelling. I'll keep the handling in a separate function to make it easier to handle in the future if needed. Brad _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
