On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 3:06 AM, Roger Bivand <[email protected]> wrote:
> https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-geo/2014-February/020409.html > > summarised as points and questions to Tim: > > Your choice of Rcpp is one that the extension of R to include reference > classes recently, provoked by Rcpp, makes possible and attractive. > > Would you prefer to use this list for postings with regard to rgdal2, or > gdal-dev, the wiki on the github repository, or some alternative? > > Would you consider perhaps aligning rgdal2 with GDAL 2.0, rather than the > GDAL 1.* series? > > This would give rgdal2 the advantage of being ready when GDAL 2 is ready, > and puts GDAL 1.* and rgdal in "maintenance mode" while GDAL 1.* is still > with us. I've replied over there. THK -- http://www.keittlab.org/
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
