Andre Joost <andre+joost <at> nurfuerspam.de> writes: > > Am 07.06.2013 01:26, schrieb Jukka Rahkonen: > > > > > The result is good if I add parameter -t_srs epsg:4326. However, this should > > be unnecessary with KML because it is always EPSG:4326 and also the driver > > manual page http://www.gdal.org/ogr/drv_kml.html claims the same in the text > > and in the examples. > > +1, the same should go for the GPX driver.
Herman Peifer wrote but forgot to send to the list: " Jukka, Could you please try with -a_srs epsg:2393 instead of -s_srs epsg:2393, see http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/4496"; This is funny, but using -a_srs:2393 in the command really leads to correct result. Following command, even being all wrong with the a_srs, gives good KML and it also overrides the erroneous prj file. ogr2ogr -f KML -a_srs epsg:2393 test6.kml test_region.shp -Jukka Rahkonen- _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
