> > There are different schools on the topic. I know Frank is not too keen on > mentionning versionning, although personnaly, I try to mention version > differences in the format page itself (http://www.gdal.org/ogr/drv_osm.html > mentions GDAL/OGR >= 1.10.0). But at the end, in drivers with a lot of > activity, > it becomes cluttered with mentions like "in version X, in version Y". Having > different version of the documentation, for each version, on the server could > solve that, although it is sometimes usefull to identify quickly that a > particular feature has been introduced in a version. > >>
Yes, I know that situation all too well (same issues with mapserver.org). I agree, mentioning GDAL/OGR version in the format page itself is very good (I push for this in mapserver.org as well, as it is very helpful for users to know what version a feature was added). K thanks for chatting. -jeff -- Jeff McKenna MapServer Consulting and Training Services http://www.gatewaygeomatics.com/ _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
