On Aug 6, 2010, at 8:10 AM, Frank Warmerdam wrote: > Martin Dobias wrote: >> Hi, >> As there have been no further comments on RFC 29, I would like to call >> for vote on it: >> http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc29_desired_fields > > +1 Frank
+0. I admit to being a bit worried about the extra complication this adds, especially with respect to FIDs and our significantly varying rules across the drivers on them. Additionally, I think the RFC should add a testable (with TestCapability) capability to allow applications to query whether or not drivers support this feature. Howard_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
