On Sun, 30 Oct 2022 at 15:02, Baruch Burstein via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 5:20 PM Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 at 13:58, David Malcolm <dmalc...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 2022-02-15 at 12:55 +0000, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote: > >> > On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 at 12:34, Baruch Burstein via Gcc < > >> > gcc@gcc.gnu.org> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > Hi, > >> > > > >> > > I hope it is not inappropriate to call attention to a specific bug. > >> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla//show_bug.cgi?id=85487. > > > > > > <snip> > > > > > Clang and the MSVC compiler both ignore any tokens after the pragma, so > > that seems good enough for GCC too: > > > > https://godbolt.org/z/norv947a5 > > > > > I am sorry for posting this again, but to the best of my understanding of > the thread at https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla//show_bug.cgi?id=85487, the > patch already exists (I am not sure where), and was not merged to GCC 12 > only because I called attention to it too late in the dev cycle, so I am > trying to get this in earlier for GCC 13.
You've waited until two weeks before the deadline for GCC 13 changes! I'll re-propose my patch, but it would have been much better to do it when I wasn't rushing to get 20 *other* changes finished in the next two weeks! > It is literally a "do-nothing" > patch.
