On 10/19/22 18:42, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Oct 2022, Martin Liška wrote:
> 
>>> Currently, there is a tarball with texinfo sources for all the manuals
>>> for each version.
>>
>> Well, then equivalent would be packaging all .rst files together with the 
>> corresponding
>> conf.py, logo.* and other files. But I don't see it much useful.
> 
> I think we should have such a source tarball when the sources are .rst, as 
> the successor to the Texinfo source tarball.

All right, putting that on my TODO list after the conversion happens. Won't be 
difficult
to achieve.

Cheers,
Martin

> 
> (Unfortunately when I added that source tarball - 
> https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2004-01/msg00140.html - I didn't 
> give specific references to any of the individual requests that resulted 
> in adding it.)

Reply via email to