On 10/19/22 18:42, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Wed, 19 Oct 2022, Martin Liška wrote: > >>> Currently, there is a tarball with texinfo sources for all the manuals >>> for each version. >> >> Well, then equivalent would be packaging all .rst files together with the >> corresponding >> conf.py, logo.* and other files. But I don't see it much useful. > > I think we should have such a source tarball when the sources are .rst, as > the successor to the Texinfo source tarball.
All right, putting that on my TODO list after the conversion happens. Won't be difficult to achieve. Cheers, Martin > > (Unfortunately when I added that source tarball - > https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2004-01/msg00140.html - I didn't > give specific references to any of the individual requests that resulted > in adding it.)
