On Mai 16 2022, Andreas Krebbel via Gcc wrote: > The only way I see right now is adding a new reg note to invalidate > the save information in the reg_save array in dwarf2cfi. > > Would this be acceptable? Is there perhaps an easier way to achieve that?
Doesn't it work to use .cfi_remember_state/.cfi_restore_state? -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."