On 16/05/2022 09.18, Joe Perches wrote: > On Mon, 2022-05-16 at 14:00 +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > [] >> Changes in v3: >> Revert suggested change in v2, for kernel test robot <l...@intel.com> found >> >> warning: Function parameter or member 'flush_workqueue' not described in >> 'void' >> warning: expecting prototype for flush_workqueue(). Prototype was for >> void() instead >> >> when built with W=1 option. > > Odd, perhaps that not a valid error message and is a defect > in gcc's parsing of function definitions.
Nah, gcc isn't buggy in such a fundamental part of parsing C. It's not a warning from gcc, nor from sparse (or smatch). It's from the perl script scripts/kernel-doc . Rasmus