> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], > [email protected] > From: Martin Liška <[email protected]> > Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 11:40:06 +0200 > > > It must > > look sensible without that. In this case it seems that already the > > generated .texinfo input to makeinfo is bad, where does the 'e' (or 'f') > > come from? The original texinfo file simply contains: > > These are auto-numbered. Theoretically one can use the verbose anchor names: > > @anchor{demo cmdoption-Wshift-overflow3}@anchor{e}@anchor{demo > cmdoption-wshift-overflow3}@anchor{f} > @deffn {Option} @w{-}Wshift@w{-}overflow3=n, @w{-}Wshift@w{-}overflow3 > > Default option value for @ref{e,,-Wshift-overflow3}. > > But these would lead to even longer '*note -Wshift-overflow3: demo > cmdoption-wshift-overflow3' output.
While auto-numbering is a nice feature, the human-readable anchors have an advantage of hinting on the topic to which the cross-reference points.
