> Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 at 1:11 AM > From: "Richard Kenner" <ken...@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> > To: dim...@gmx.com > Cc: david.br...@hesbynett.no, g...@gnu.org, rodg...@appliantology.com > Subject: Re: GCC association with the FSF > > > > > So, that's a solid 'no' on the likelihood of you contributing > > > > anything of value to the discussion of GCC governance then? > > > > > > I really think that most of the people replying on this thread have a > > > much more encompassing view of "GCC governance" than actually exists. > > > > If the community makes it too hard by demanding too much (which > > seems to me that it is bending towards the merely bureaucratic), > > people would be discouraged to serve on it. > > I'm sorry, what is it that you think that the "community" (whatever > that is) is demanding too much of?
Some have been saying that leaders are representatives of the whole free software users, and if mistakes happen, they would tarnish everybody. And then a situation similar to this one starts all over again. I would say that it is the organisers of events that have such responsibility.
