Hi! On 5/25/20 2:56 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> I'm thinking about attempting to do the CC0 transition for the >> AVR port in my spare time. I've read the CC0Transition gcc wiki >> page, and as the AVR ISA does not have non-condition-code >> clobbering arithmetic instructions, concluded that I'd have to >> follow the steps outlined for case #2. > > If you are working on it, it might be a good idea to log in to > Bountysource.com > and mark the issue as being worked on [1], so you can get the bounty in case > the conversion has been successful.
Important update: Bountysource has announced that they will let bounties expire in the future if not claimed after two years [1]. So, unless someone claims the money with the next two years, the money will be gone. It would therefore be good for anyone working on the AVR MODE_CC conversion (Senthil?) that they submit a claim for this bounty [2] after the patches to convert the AVR backend have been accepted upstream. It would be a shame if the money would be taken by Bountysource in the end. If the developer who submits the claim, cannot take the money for legal reasons (i.e. because worked on it during company time), I would suggest donating the money to a good cause. The same applies to the campaign for the VAX backend [3]. Adrian > [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23551098 > [2] > https://www.bountysource.com/issues/84630749-avr-convert-the-backend-to-mode_cc-so-it-can-be-kept-in-future-releases > [3] > https://www.bountysource.com/issues/91495157-vax-convert-the-backend-to-mode_cc-so-it-can-be-kept-in-future-releases -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
