On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 06:23:16PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > To me, that indicates that using a conversion tool that is conservative in > > its heuristics, and then selectively applying improvements to the extent > > they can be done safely with manual review in a reasonable time, is better > > than applying a conversion tool with more aggressive heuristics. > > Then you need to just completely drop this, and always use > <usern...@gcc.gnu.org>, because a large percentage will get that anyway > then. Which is fine with me, fwiw: it's correct, and it's a little > inconvenient perhaps, but it doesn't really make the result less usable > at all. > > Precisely like weird merges on svn tags that aren't even on a branch. > Perfect is the enemy of ever getting a conversion done.
Oh, and let me add: $ date -d "aug 20 2015 + 1600 days" That is how long this reposurgeon obstinence has delayed us so far. Happy turn of the year everyone, Segher
