Hi Andrew,
Appreciate your reply here and yes unoptimized code is expected to be
large ,but for the construct like a[i] the below generated code looks
crazy to me .
ld WA, 10
ld (_a+18), WA ; a[9] = 10;
ld WA, (_i) ;code bloated here for a[i]
ld IX, WA
ld BC, 15
cal _C87C_shris
ld IY, WA
ld DE, WA
ld HL, BC
ld WA, IX
add WA, IX
ld DE, WA
ld WA, DE
ld BC, HL
ld HL, 1
ld (SP+2), HL
cmp WA,IX
j lt,_.L2
ld DE, 0
ld (SP+2), DE
.L2:
ld DE, WA
ld HL, BC
ld BC, IY
add BC, IY
ld HL, BC
ld WA, DE
ld BC, HL
ld DE, (SP+2)
add DE, BC
ld BC, DE
ld HL, WA
ld (SP+0), HL
ld WA, 20
ld HL, (SP+0)
ld (a+i), WA
Anyidea why it so ??
Thank you in advance
~Umesh
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Andrew Haley <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 04/10/2014 04:12 PM, Umesh Kalappa wrote:
>
>> Please somebody from the group can share their thoughts and will be
>> appricate the same.
>
> But unoptimized code is expected to be large. Why do you expect
> otherwise?
>
> Andrew.
>
